 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground Zero
|
|
|
|
Summer '98 July - September |
|
|
|
|
|
Volume 3 Issue 2 |
|
|
|
|
Finding
a Purpose for Useless Tridents
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
have been asked to write a short article on what I see as Trident's present
purpose. That is easy. It keeps the business going for weapons
merchants and enhances prestige for a navy fearfully involved with inter-service
rivalry. I'll discuss these two functions in more detail.
Keeping The Business Going.
America now has its planned fleet
of 18 Trident submarines fully equipped with missiles and spares.
The number of submarines will be reduced to 14 when and if the Russian
Duma ratify START-2. Four of the eight older subs based at Bangor
will then be available for other purposes. But START-2 is far from being
ratified and the Russians may never approve it if the US continues its
plan for NATO expansion.
The eight subs at Bangor carry the
older, shorter-range and less accurate Trident-1 missiles. Contrary
to a Pentagon-commissioned study which determined that these mis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
siles
would last well beyond the service life of the submarines, the Navy claims
otherwise and says it will be cheaper to refit the submarines with new
Trident-2 missiles than it would be to restart the Trident-1 productions
line for replacements. Therefore the Trident-2 production line is
still open and cranking out missiles for the US and Britain. It is
the only US strategic missile currently inn production but it's production
is scheduled to close in 2005 if the fleet is cut to 14 subs, and the service
life of the submarines is not extended.
Should the fleet
remain at 18 subs production will continue perhaps six to eight years longer.
But Trident-2 production would be perpetuated indefinitely if the Navy
extends the service life of the submarines.
Not unexpectedly,
in early 1998 the Navy did announce that it had tacked 12 years onto the
service life of all 18 Trident submarines, certifying they could operate
up to 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
years.
That will keep the missile factory in business for a couple more decades
at least. It will also provide more work for the submarine builders
- especially if four of the subs are eventually reworked to perform other
functions.
Enhancing Navy Prestige.
Trident is the centerpiece of the
Pentagon's strategic arsenal. But the forces of US doctrine has switched
away from a strategic thermonuclear war to regional wars - a strategy in
which the Navy has much more competition. Although very little about
Navy ambitions has filtered out for public consumption, we can examine
a few remarks to glean some insight on what to expect regarding a tactical
Trident. Although using Trident missiles would be an expensive way
to deliver a tactical warhead, and given that such use of a nuclear missile
would be politically and diplomatically unacceptable, the surgical application
of a precise, deeply pene
(Continued
on page 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Bangor
to Become Home To Most Destructive Force on Earth
Stephen Augustine |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According
to a report recently released by the National Resources Defense Council,
Taking
Stock: Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998, there are currently 14 nuclear
states in the country with the top five states accounting for 70 percent
of the nation's total of 12,000 nuclear weapons. Washington State's present
nuclear stockpile exceeds that of four of the six acknowledged nuclear
countries. In the next few years Washington State is slated to become the
state with the most number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nuclear
warheads in the country. Currently it is ranked third after New Mexico
and Georgia. Of Washington's 1685 nuclear warheads 1600 are based on Trident
submarines out of Bangor. Later this summer the last of California's nuclear
weapons - 160 submarine-launched nuclear tipped cruise missiles will be
transferred to Bangor. Rear Admiral Paul Sullivan, commander of the Trident
submarine fleet at Bangor was quoted as saying that the transfer from California
was "a growth mission for the Strategic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weapons
Facility Pacific" at Bangor. In addition to this movement of missiles from
California the Navy is in the process of converting all the Bangor-based
subs from the older C-4 missile to the newer D-5 missile at a total cost
of around $6.4 billion.
An additional 85 nuclear warheads deployed
on bombers are based at Fairchild Air Force Base near Spokane. Once the
implementation of Start II is completed Georgia's
(Continued
on page 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|